The Handmaid's Tale - Margaret Attwood ~ Review

12/06/18 19:27

"Nolite te Bastardes Carborundorum."

I can't remember the first time actively I took notice of The Handmaid's Tale. I had seen trailers for season 2 of the Hulu series fairly regularly, it almost seemed like it was following me around. It eventually came up on my GoodReads, which was when I found out that it was a book (yay!) and that it was written by Margaret Attwood. I was pleasantly surprised when I saw her name, as I'd recently attempted one of her much earlier novels (her first, in fact) and I couldn't finish it - a shame because I had done a small amount of research on Attwood before starting The Edible Woman and thought she was fab - I'd never read anything before by a feminist writer. So, I bought a copy of The Handmaid's Tale, (via e-book, because I couldn't wait for it to arrive) and I got to reading.

The Handmaid's Tale more than deserves it's rave reviews, it has a fascinating and totally compelling storyline and I could not put it down*. This was my first dystopian novel* and it totally floored me. The basis of this terrifying civilization is that extreme pollution and radiation has caused widespread infertility, and a Christian totalitarian state named Gilead has taken over. Women are oppressed and have their rights refuted, and are forced to either;

if fertile, become:
a) sex slaves Handmaids (women who have previously broken a law who are forced to carry and birth children for wealthy households), or
b) sex slaves Jezebels ("entertainers"),

if infertile, become:
a) slaves Marthas (housekeepers), or
b) slaves Unwomen (infertile women/feminists/lesbians/women who follow a different religion/Handmaids who fail to get pregnant after 6 years. They are forced to work in labour camps called the Colonies, where they attempt to get rid of toxic waste - this is in short, a death sentence.)

There's more to it, but you get the picture. All women are completely tyrannized, it's petrifying and its worst element is, it's not all that far-fetched. This isn't a novel depicting an impossible society - it's a warning for future generations.



I really thought this novel was written beautifully by Attwood, at many points throughout the book I found myself pausing specifically to admire metaphors used to illustrate Offred's position, which isn't something I can say happens to me too often. I also called my sister, Sophie, numerous times to tell her how much I was enjoying it*, along with anyone who's ear I could talk off about it.
 "A rat in a maze is free to go anywhere, as long as it stays inside the maze."
There were also moments where Attwood took such a fantastically objective, almost bird's eye view of life, and gave us these beautiful but eerie analyses in abundance, which I thought were so smart and out of the box.
"No mother is ever, completely, a child's idea of what a mother should be, and I suppose it works the other way around as well."  
"He was not a monster, to her. Probably he had some endearing trait: he whistled, off key, in the shower, he had a yen for truffles...How easy it is to invent a humanity, for anyone at all."



Spoilers! Please scroll away now if you want to read the book, or skip to the conclusion! Have you seen my review of The Girls by Emma Kline?? It's based on the Manson serial killer cult family and it's really good. Are you gone? Good. First of all, I can't believe Ofglen committed harry carry*, I was devastated! I found out while I was midway through the book that Alexis Bledel plays Ofglen in the series, and I'm a big Gilmore Girls fan, so I hated picturing this! I plan to watch the series soon, so at least I was able to brace myself.
Let's talk about the final chapter, which I almost didn't read because I thought it was a boring analysis. Just in case you didn't read it and made the same mistake that I almost did, the chapter is a continuation of the plot, based in a university approximately 200 years after Gilead took over, where a guest speaker is conducting a lecture on the accuracy of a manuscript. This is referred to as 'The Handmaid's Tale' and is an assemblage of thirty transcripts of anonymous tapes found in a previously locked army storage trunk in an underground 'femaleroad' in Maine. They talk for a while about their attempts to find out Offred's real name, and who her commander was, but I'll let you read that yourselves. Now, being the ever-optimist that I am, I refuse to take anything from this other than the idea that Offred escaped. I've entertained the idea that maybe she didn't. Maybe she was simply taken by Mayday, who as we know took her away from her posting under the guise of violating state secrets, and was allowed to tell her story for the education of future generations. She could have then been re-posted, or sent to become a jezebel. I only hope that she wasn't sent to the colonies.



Spoiler Free Zone Below

I think the only critique I have of The Handmaid's Tale, if you can call it a critique, is that it's slightly difficult to understand the whole plot until you've finished the book - Attwood has a funny way of revealing small bits of background information at a time, so that the scene feels almost like it hasn't fully been set until the very end of the book, and even then I had questions, for example, I couldn't work out why Econowives weren't also forced to be Handmaid's. It's a peculiar writing style, but I can't say that I totally disliked it, it certainly had me on my toes and pondering things in-between chapters.



The Handmaid's Tale is going to receive a well deserved 5/5 from me. I absolutely loved it, from the first page to the last. Beautifully written, fantastic plot. Margaret Attwood has been firmly redeemed in my eyes, and I'll be looking to read more of her work soon.


Laura x



* I missed my stop on the metro home one night while reading it because I was so engrossed and ended up having to get 2 more metros to get home :) :) :)

* Excluding my first attempt at George Orwell's 1984, which didn't go quite as swimmingly.

* Much to Soph's distain, as this was next on her reading list but she was going through an intense exam period at uni and had no time for recreational reading. Poor gal, love u <3

* Just googled Harry Carry and found out it's actually "Hara Kiri" and it means suicide by disembowelment!!!! what the heck

1984 - George Orwell ~ Review

04/06/18 22:30 (Monday, zzz)


"We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end."



Good Evening Comrades!


1984 is a highly rated, well-known classic which I'd wanted to read for ages - for those of you who don't know, this book originated the ideas of both Big Brother and Room 101. I finally got around to giving it a try in February, but I'm not going to lie, I found it really boring and gave up on page 60.
I was bewildered because, how can a novel so highly rated, which inspired multiple successful television programs be so rubbish? I spoke to a few people about my frustrations with the novel, and they insisted it was fantastic and worth reading, so I was determined to give it another try (after all, 60 pages out of 336 isn't exactly a good basis to criticise a book.. a fitting idiom comes to mind*). On my second attempt, I jumped in with both feet, managed to get through what I read in January quite quickly and went on to finish the book, hurrah!

Here's a brief summary of Orwell's 1984 (spoilers omitted), courtesy of CliffsNotes:

"Winston Smith wrestles with oppression in Oceania, a place where the Party scrutinizes human actions with ever-watchful Big Brother. Defying a ban on individuality, Winston dares to express his thoughts in a diary and pursues a relationship with Julia."*

SO, on with my thoughts. 1984 is written in thirds, which I think will be the best way to review how I felt while reading it.


ONE

Jumping back in, I found that no, I'm not crazy, the storyline is very dry for the first 33*%. It's just paragraph after paragraph of Winston waking up, going to work, working, eating his dinner, then coming home - so as exciting as you'd expect. It introduces the boring, bland characters, and sets a very mundane scene while explaining the extent of the totalitarianism - think Hitler's Germany, pushed to the extreme. Everyone has an intense "you're spying on me, I'm spying on you" mentality. In essence, this third does what you need, but not what you want.

My thoughts: "This is rubbish and I'm bored, get on with it so I can read something else."


TWO

During this third, the story gets far more exciting... until you reach "The Book". For approximately 2 chapters, Winston Smith reads a book titled, 'The Book'; it's all very meta. These pages I honestly felt like skipping, they were just hard to read and it felt boring again - it had just gotten exciting, haway man. I stuck with it though, and I found it helped significantly to listen to an audiobook (I listened to this one) while reading along - otherwise I felt I was reading the words but not digesting any meaning, and what's the point in that, I may as well skip it.
Eventually I did manage to understand what was being said, and it was really interesting - albeit a bit  l o n g. The Book is mainly an analysis of 1984's society, and while a lot of it is somewhat obvious, it is also highly helpful in the understanding of the most common Newspeak words, doublethink and such, which you need in order to understand a lot of the talking points in the final third, so read it.

My thoughts: "Oo Winston you little rebel, this is getting exciti- Oh. I have to read this? Really?"


THREE

Epiphanies, epiphanies everywhere. This third was fantastic, and well worth the wait. I don't want to spoil anything major for anyone, so I won't go into too much detail. My only criticism of this book is that I wanted more about Room 101! It made my skin crawl and I had to stop reading every few paragraphs for feeling sick, but that just goes to show how well written it is.

My thoughts: "Holy *insert your favourite profanity here*, it's brilliant!"



Now, I'm going to attempt a conclusion of this book without blabbering on too much - believe me I've blabbered on about it enough to my boyfriend, who half-listened while I ranted and raved about my realization during the final third.

I'm rating 1984 a 4/5. Yes, the first third might be bland, as are the characters, but this is part of the beauty of it - it makes it so relatable. I don't know about you, but my day to day life is fairly dull and wouldn't make for good reading, much like the first third of 1984. Winston could be any ordinary man or woman, an innocent bystander in a world of power-hungry adversaries.

1984 teeters on the edge of being creepy - I've seen a number of people say it should be listed under the horror genre. While I don't completely agree, I can't say it's not spooky when considering that it was written all the way back in 1948, and many of the issues brought up in 1984 are so relevant to issues we're facing today as a society - so much of the analysis, particularly in "The Book", made perfect sense applied to the way we still live now. The link between 1984's telescreens and our smartphones/social media isn't a leap by any means - how many apps do we let run in the background that track your location or spy on what you're searching for online? It would be so easy in this modern world for a government similar to that in 1984 to take over and control our thoughts and actions - an issue that came to light recently regarding Facebook's influence over America's 2016 election. This book should absolutely be read as a warning.







* Don't judge a book by it's cover, anyone?

* Despite their relationship being a prominent storyline, this is NOT a love story.

*(cont.) .3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333...